Extracts from the article as follows:
Andrew Byles says the courts are called upon to decide issues which can have a fundamental and detrimental effect upon the parties appearing before them. He explains: "I have little doubt an increase in the number of litigants in person will often increase the workload of practitioners representing the opposing party and will often cause proceedings to last longer than they otherwise would. This is because courts are reluctant to make decisions that are adverse to litigants in person without first trying to ensure they understand what is going on and have an opportunity to properly participate in the hearing."
With proceedings involving litigants in person taking longer, there are inevitable cost consequences. He says: "It is a consequence of the court making the effort to ensure they understand what is going on and can participate.
"It is also the consequence of litigants in person being unfamiliar with the court process and with them covering every possible point in evidence, cross-examination and submissions rather than only the relevant points.