US Supreme Court denies writ of certiorari in Walter v Pennsylvania

1 February 2016

Garden Court North Chambers’ Mark George QC has assisted with drafting the amicus curiae brief filed on behalf of the Bar Human Rights Committee in support of the petitioner in this US death penalty case. The amicus brief set out the reasoning for and the process by which the United Kingdom abolished the death penalty in the 1960s as well as the history of death penalty abolition in other common law countries such as South Africa, Canada, Ireland and Australia.

The Supreme Court of the United States announced on 25 January 2016 that it was denying a petition for the writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania in the case of Shonda Walter v  Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. 

The case involved a direct challenge to the continuing constitutionality of the death penalty posing the question “whether in all cases, imposition of a sentence of death violates the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition against cruel and unusual punishments.”  The case sought to take up the challenge laid down by Breyer J in his dissent in the case of Glossip v Gross 576 US (2015) in which he argued that it was time for the Supreme Court to reconsider this very question and called for full briefing on this issue.

News

News

Academic Associate Member Professor Javaid Rehman begins pupillage

Garden Court North Chambers is delighted to announce that Academic Associate Member Professor Javaid Rehman has commenced pupillage.  

News

Covid-19 Inquiry’s Module 3 report: NHS was “on the brink of collapse” during the pandemic

Garden Court North’s Covid-19 public inquiries team has represented Covid-19 Bereaved Families for Justice UK throughout the Inquiry.

News

Failure to provide James Stow with a one-to-one mental health nurse “possibly contributed” to his death, inquest jury finds

Garden Court North's Camille Warren represented James Stow's sister during the inquest at South London Coroner's Court.

News

Judicial review settled after Tasaddat Hussain secures permission to challenge refusal of initial claim for vulnerable client

Tasaddat has secured permission to appeal on behalf of his client, a vulnerable man who fled Iraqi Kurdistan to seek asylum in the UK.

Sign up to our mailing list

Our mailing list is dedicated to professionals with an interest in our work.

Sign up