Considering Jogee: Joint Enterprise, Retrospective Effect, Fresh Appeals

18 Feb 2016

The Supreme Court has today handed down judgment in R v Jogee [2016] UKSC 8, finding that Joint Enterprise law has been wrongly interpreted for 30 years. A crucial consequence of this judgment is now the effect it will have on others convicted under “Joint Enterprise” law and their potential for appeal.

Garden Court North Chambers’ Matthew Stanbury has written a blog considering the retrospective effect of Jogee: Joint Enterprise and Retrospective Effect (The Public Lawyer).

Chambers’ Mark George QC has also written a Blog in which he concludes:

“…what the SC has done in this case is to acknowledge not that the law was wrong and needed correction but that the courts interpretation of the law was wrong.  It is that misinterpretation that has been corrected not the substantive law itself.  In those circumstances what the SC has said about fresh appeals seems to me to be open to doubt.  If people have been convicted of murder when on the law as it stood at the time they should not have been convicted of anything more than manslaughter that is an obvious miscarriage of justice that the courts should be keen to correct.”

Additionally, Chambers’ Nina Grahame presented a paper at the recent CLFS Crime Conference on “Joint Enterprise Liability – Jogee and the welcome demise of Parasitic Accessory Liability”.

Share this

Chambers news

Chambers news

Supreme Court allows appeal and settles law relating to interest accruing on non-payment of confiscation orders and whether or not interest impacts on default term

Pete Weatherby QC and Matthew Stanbury succeed before the Supreme Court in R (Gene Gibson) v Secretary of State for Justice.

Chambers news

Peter Hodson – Happy Retirement

After 23 years at the Bar, most of them spent at Garden Court North Chambers, Peter Hodson has decided to retire from practice.

Chambers news

No case to answer in a prosecution alleging the murder of a baby by his parents and leave to appeal refused to the prosecution by the Court of Appeal

Garden Court North Chambers' Pete Weatherby QC and Nina Grahame represented C, the father of the baby.

Chambers news

DWP unlawfully delayed paying carer benefits for 4 years

Tom Royston, a barrister at Garden Court North Chambers, appeared in Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Fileccia [2017] EWCA Civ 1907.

Sign up to our mailing list

Our mailing list is dedicated to professionals with an interest in our work.

Sign up