Garden Court North Chambers win “Barristers’ Chambers of the Year” at the MLA 2016

07 Mar 2016

Garden Court North Chambers has one Barristers’ Chambers of the Year at the Manchester Legal Awards 2016, with the judge observing that: “these chambers are swimming against the tide, fighting incredibly hard for their clients and displaying an admirable passion and commitment. They are worthy winners.”

There were no speeches by winners of awards but Head of Chambers, Mark George QC has made the following statement:

Garden Court North Chambers is an avowedly legal aid set and very proud to be so.   We are to legal services what the NHS is to health services and just as people go to a doctor if they need healthcare without wondering if their credit card is fully charged, we think you should be able to go to see a lawyer because you need help with a legal problem without worrying about the cost.

We serve clients from many different walks of life but it is true to say that significant numbers of our lay clients are people of whom it can be said that life has not been kind.  Many have suffered discrimination or persecution, they suffer from poverty and poor health, including in some cases poor mental health.

That is why you will find barristers from Chamber involved in cases as diverse as the current challenge to the “bedroom tax”, challenges to Home Office decisions refusing asylum claims and representing some of the families at the Hillsborough Inquests.  But in addition to such cases every day our members are fighting to uphold and enforce the rights of clients in both civil and criminal courts and tribunals across the country.  Most of these cases and the other work we do are funded through the legal aid scheme.

When I started my own career almost 40 years ago we were sometimes ridiculed and called “the radical Bar”.  I didn’t think we were radical at all. All we were doing was helping ordinary people to take advantage of the availability of legal aid to enforce their legal rights.   The only “radical” thing about it was the notion that you didn’t have to be well heeled in order to be able to enforce your rights.

In recent years however, whole areas of law have been taken out of scope for legal aid.  Not just in family cases but in other areas of social welfare law, prison law and immigration people in desperate need are now denied legal help.  Access to justice whether you can pay or not, which is surely a hallmark of any civilised society, has been completely destroyed for many poor and middle income earners.

Those cuts have hit our clients hard but it also means that it hasn’t been easy being legal aid lawyers in recent years.  Successive governments have seen legal aid as an easy target for cuts which threatens the current diversity of the Bar and makes it harder to recruit the brightest young lawyers to our ranks.   They have also added significantly to the administrative burden placed on our clerking team.

As I said when interviewed by a panel of the judges what is the point of having legal rights if you cannot enforce them?  But how do you do that without a lawyer expert in that field? And how can you get a lawyer to take your case unless there is in place a system for ensuring that lawyer can get paid for their work?

That is why legal aid solicitors and barristers are not a luxury item only to be to tolerated in times of plenty. They are an essential part of a properly functioning legal services sector.

We are very pleased that our contribution as legal aid lawyers providing a vital service to our clients has been recognised through this award.  I am very happy to accept it on behalf of my hard-working and very committed colleagues in chambers and our utterly dedicated clerking team.”

Share this

Chambers news

Chambers news

Supreme Court allows appeal and settles law relating to interest accruing on non-payment of confiscation orders and whether or not interest impacts on default term

Pete Weatherby QC and Matthew Stanbury succeed before the Supreme Court in R (Gene Gibson) v Secretary of State for Justice.

Chambers news

Peter Hodson – Happy Retirement

After 23 years at the Bar, most of them spent at Garden Court North Chambers, Peter Hodson has decided to retire from practice.

Chambers news

No case to answer in a prosecution alleging the murder of a baby by his parents and leave to appeal refused to the prosecution by the Court of Appeal

Garden Court North Chambers' Pete Weatherby QC and Nina Grahame represented C, the father of the baby.

Chambers news

DWP unlawfully delayed paying carer benefits for 4 years

Tom Royston, a barrister at Garden Court North Chambers, appeared in Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Fileccia [2017] EWCA Civ 1907.

Sign up to our mailing list

Our mailing list is dedicated to professionals with an interest in our work.

Sign up