Hillsborough Families Let Down Again

6 December 2023

Hillsborough Law Government response

After a significant delay, described as ‘too long’ by the Justice Minister Alex Chalk, the UK Government has published its response to a report written six years ago into the 27-year process leading to justice faced by the bereaved families of the Hillsborough tragedy.

The report, written by the then Bishop of Liverpool, the Right Reverend James Jones, made 25 recommendations for future inquests involving public bodies, including equal funding given to bereaved families compared to the state and the introduction of a duty of candour for all public officials – outlined in ‘Hillsborough Law’ drafted by GCN’s Pete Weatherby KC.

Pete and fellow GCN Silk Anna Morris KC gave evidence earlier this year to the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights about this topic.

Despite Hillsborough families calling for Hillsborough Law to be implemented in its entirety, the government has declined to do so, extending the duty of candour only to the Police. The government response states that: ‘Chief Officers will be held to account for their forces’ performance against the [Code of Practice for
ethical policing]’.

The response later explains the government’s rationale for not extending the duty of candour to all public officials: ‘It is our view that the duties and obligations that have been created since the Hillsborough disaster, combined with actions set out in this response – including signing the Hillsborough Charter, consulting on the expansion of legal aid, and placing a statutory duty of candour on the police – broadly achieves the aims and upholds the principles of what has come to be known as the “Hillsborough Law”‘.

The response outlines that the government has signed a “Hillsborough charter”, which Mr Chalk explained ‘commits signatories — the leaders of public bodies — to strive to place the public interest above the reputation of their own organisations; to approach all forms of public scrutiny, including public inquiries and inquests, with candour in an open, honest and transparent way; and to avoid seeking to defend the indefensible’.

Pete Weatherby KC said: ‘The government response is completely cynical and inadequate adding no new duties on public servants or powers to prevent cover-ups. It pretends to address massive and ongoing problems of lack of candour, whilst doing the opposite. The Labour Party has promised to enact Hillsborough Law if elected, supported by almost all the other parties. The families will continue to fight to ensure that promise is kept.’

Read Right Reverend James Jones’ report ‘The patronising disposition of unaccountable power’ A report to  ensure the pain and suffering of the Hillsborough families is not repeated.

Read the government’s response A Hillsborough Legacy: the Government’s response to Bishop James Jones’  report to ensure the pain and suffering of the Hillsborough families is never repeated.

Media coverage of the Government response can be found below:

Chambers news

Chambers news

Universal Credit rent deductions scheme declared unlawful by High Court

In R (Roberts) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2025] EWHC 51 (Admin) (16 January 2025) the High Court (Fordham J) decides that the...

Chambers news

Amy Butcher: Coroner identifies “muddled and unclear system for the prescription of medication” and issues Prevention of Future Deaths report to the Secretary of State for Health & Social Care

Amy Butcher was 27 years old when she died by suicide. She was under the care of the Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust Crisis...

Chambers news

Child defendant indicted for the attempted murder of her friend is sentenced to a Youth Rehabilitation Order.

Nina Grahame KC represented a 14-year old girl committed to Minshull Street Crown Court for the attempted murder of her 14-year old friend, possession of...

Chambers news

Court of Appeal dismisses Secretary of State’s appeal in Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Versnick and Jarvis-Wingate [2024] EWCA Civ 1454 (29 November 2024)

This case concerned whether an EU national with pre-settled status could rely on benefits paid to his wife, a British citizen, to be entitled to...

Sign up to our mailing list

Our mailing list is dedicated to professionals with an interest in our work.

Sign up