JR elicits clarification of Section 25 of the Magistrates Courts Act 1980

07 Mar 2006

Judicial Review proceedings brought against Manchester City Youth Court yesterday were successful in challenging the Youth Court’s decision to decline jurisdiction to deal with trial and sentence. Clarification of this procedure under Section 25 was then given.

R (on the application of R) v Manchester City Youth Court [2006] EWHC 564 (Admin)  is one of a long line of cases challenging decisions of Youth Courts to decline jurisdiction and commit for trial where there was no realistic prospect of the defendant being given a sentence in excess of 2 years detention (see Section 24 of the Magistrates Courts Act 1980).

The Claimant, R, aged 15 and of previous good character, was charged with an unremarkable burglary. Ouseley J quashed the decisions to refuse jurisdiction and to commit for trial on the basis that it was inconceivable that R would receive a sentence of detention for more than 2 years.

The decision is significant because the Judge went on to clarify the procedure under Section 25, whereby the Youth Court should have revisited the issue of venue at the committal proceedings, and were entitled to revert to accepting jurisdiction and dealing with the matter summarily.

The Claimant was represented by Garden Court North Chambers’ Pete Weatherby (instructed by Otten Penna Solicitors).

Share this

Chambers news

Chambers news

Unlawful and nonsensical – test case on approach to income calculation in Universal Credit

Court rules against government in test case on approach to income calculation in Universal Credit.

Chambers news

QC appointment at Garden Court North Chambers

Just announced Nina Grahame of Garden Court North Chambers has been appointed to Queen’s Counsel.

Chambers news

Garden Court North Chambers wins The Legal 500 UK Regional Set of the Year 2019 and Regional Bar Junior of the Year 2019

We are delighted to announce our success at The Legal 500 UK 2019 Awards.

Chambers news

Safi v Sandwell BC Approved Judgment

Safi v Sandwell approved judgment handed down this morning by Lord Justice David Richards at the Court of Appeal.

Sign up to our mailing list

Our mailing list is dedicated to professionals with an interest in our work.

Sign up