Permission granted in judicial review challenging negative Reasonable Grounds decision in a trafficking claim

17 Dec 2015

Sir Stephen Silber, sitting as a Judge of the High Court, has granted permission in SF v SSHD [2015] EWHC 2705 (Admin), a judicial review claim challenging a negative Reasonable Grounds decision in a trafficking claim. Garden Court North Chambers’ Lucy Mair represented the Claimant.

The Claimant had been trafficked as a child but the Defendant (SSHD) had not considered her own guidance with regard to child victims. Furthermore, the Defendant’s approach to credibly had not been informed by her own guidance. The judge emphasized the total paucity of any mention of the Defendant’s Modern Slavery Guidance in granting permission and accepted that it was arguable that the Defendant had applied the wrong test at the reasonable grounds stage (“I suspect but cannot prove”). In his judgment the judge held that:  “It is trite law that a failure by a public authority to follow its own established policy can be an error of law without good reason to depart from it (Lumba v Secretary of State (supra)).” [185].

In granting permission the judge also said that the Defendant had failed to show by her reasoning that every factor which tells in favor of the Claimant had been properly taken into account, referring to the principle established by Carnwath LJ in R (YH) v Secretary of State [2010] EWCA Civ 116 [24]. During the course of the permission hearing the judge reiterated the unique nature of the searching and collaborative enquiry that is required by the Defendant when considering claims that a person has been trafficked, as distinct from other areas of fact finding. This is because, as explained in the Explanatory Note to the Trafficking Convention, “Failure to identify a trafficking victim correctly will probably mean that victim’s continuing to be denied his or her fundamental rights …”

The judge also reiterated his finding in SF that the standard of review to be applied by the court in reviewing a trafficking claim was one of “heightened” or “more rigorous” scrutiny.

Lucy was instructed by Mervyn Cross at Duncan Lewis Solicitors.

Share this

Chambers news

Chambers news

Peter Hodson – Happy Retirement

After 23 years at the Bar, most of them spent at Garden Court North Chambers, Peter Hodson has decided to retire from practice.

Chambers news

No case to answer in a prosecution alleging the murder of a baby by his parents and leave to appeal refused to the prosecution by the Court of Appeal

Garden Court North Chambers' Pete Weatherby QC and Nina Grahame represented C, the father of the baby.

Chambers news

DWP unlawfully delayed paying carer benefits for 4 years

Tom Royston, a barrister at Garden Court North Chambers, appeared in Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Fileccia [2017] EWCA Civ 1907.

Chambers news

Worker registration scheme found to be unlawful

Hundreds of thousands of EU workers were unlawfully required to register with the Home Office and others were unlawfully deprived of benefits.

Sign up to our mailing list

Our mailing list is dedicated to professionals with an interest in our work.

Sign up