Permission granted in Parole Board independence case

7 August 2018

A serving prisoner, Paul Wakenshaw, has been granted permission, by Mr Justice Mostyn sitting in the High Court, to challenge the independence of the Parole Board in a claim for judicial review.

The claim follows on from the removal of the Parole Board Chair, Professor Nick Hardwick, who was asked to resign by Secretary of State for Justice, David Gauke MP, in the wake of the John Worboys case. Permission has been granted on the basis that there is a lack of security of tenure for Parole Board members (including the Chair) as evidenced by the circumstances in which Professor Hardwick offered his resignation (see paragraphs 21 to 27 of the judgment in particular).

Mr Wakenshaw’s case is that it was constitutionally improper for the Secretary of State to have requested that the head of a judicial body to resign without any procedure being followed to determine whether there were grounds for his removal. A full hearing of the claim will take place in due course.

Mr Wakenshaw is represented by Garden Court North Chambers’ Matthew Stanbury and by Tim Owen QC, instructed by Dean Kingham of Swain and Co Solicitors.

News

News

Inquest into death of Brooke Wiggins hears “lack of public awareness” around dangers of rope swings

Garden Court North’s Christian Weaver represented Brooke’s father during the inquest at South London Coroner’s Court.

News

A Duty of Candour is desperately needed. Ten years on, why is Hillsborough Law stalled?

The false narrative run by MI5 officials during the inquiry into Manchester Arena bombing epitomises the need for a full duty of candour.

News

Garden Court North stands in solidarity with Rajiv Menon KC as he faces prosecution for contempt of court

Rajiv Menon KC faces prosecution for contempt of court in the closing speech he delivered to a jury when defending pro-Palestine protesters.

News

Bethany Currie successfully defends mandatory rent arrears ground possession claim

The private landlord who brought the possession claim alleged that the defendant owed £7,000 in unpaid rent.