Permission granted in Parole Board independence case

07 Aug 2018

A serving prisoner, Paul Wakenshaw, has been granted permission, by Mr Justice Mostyn sitting in the High Court, to challenge the independence of the Parole Board in a claim for judicial review.

The claim follows on from the removal of the Parole Board Chair, Professor Nick Hardwick, who was asked to resign by Secretary of State for Justice, David Gauke MP, in the wake of the John Worboys case. Permission has been granted on the basis that there is a lack of security of tenure for Parole Board members (including the Chair) as evidenced by the circumstances in which Professor Hardwick offered his resignation (see paragraphs 21 to 27 of the judgment in particular).

Mr Wakenshaw’s case is that it was constitutionally improper for the Secretary of State to have requested that the head of a judicial body to resign without any procedure being followed to determine whether there were grounds for his removal. A full hearing of the claim will take place in due course.

Mr Wakenshaw is represented by Garden Court North Chambers’ Matthew Stanbury and by Tim Owen QC, instructed by Dean Kingham of Swain and Co Solicitors.

Share this

Chambers news

Chambers news

The Northern Housing Conference: Housing law update, homelessness and the role of the law

Chambers' James Stark will be speaking about "absolute possession orders and how to avoid them" at NWHLPG's Conference on September 19th 2018.

Chambers news

Supreme Court declares law denying unmarried people widowed parent’s allowance incompatible with Convention rights

Tom Royston acted for CPAG in the matter of an application by Siobhan McLaughlin for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland) [2018] UKSC 48.

Chambers news

Permission granted in Parole Board independence case

A serving prisoner, represented by Matthew Stanbury, has been granted permission to challenge the independence of the Parole Board in a claim for judicial review.

Chambers news

Following judicial review, the DWP accepts it must pay up to an extra £150,000,000 to correct ESA errors in up to 70,000 cases

Tom Royston discusses R (Smith) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions JR/1249/2018.

Sign up to our mailing list

Our mailing list is dedicated to professionals with an interest in our work.

Sign up