Rethinking double jeopardy

5 January 2012

David Norris and Gary Dobson were convicted and sentenced for the racist murder of Stephen Lawrence this week. In an article for online magazine The Justice Gap, Garden Court North Chambers’ Mark George QC writes about the change in double jeopardy law which allowed this trial to go ahead.

In his article, Mark looks back to the historical origins of double jeopardy and contrasts the domestic position with that in the United States, “where it was regarded so fundamental that it was enshrined in the Fifth Amendment (‘nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb’™)”.

He explains that “the range of cases that can be re-tried as a result of the change in the law is limited…the interests of the accused are protected by the procedures that the prosecution have to initiate”.

Mark George QC is a barrister and Head of Chambers at Garden Court North Chambers.



Injunctions in the Court of Protection – what are the limits?

The extent of the Court of Protection’s power to grant injunctions has not always been clear, to judges and lawyers alike. Practitioners will recall that...


International Women’s Day 2023

As part of our celebration of this year’s International Women’s Day we are highlighting Anna Morris – an exceptional barrister who has recently been appointed...


What is it like to be a GCN Practice Manager?

We asked our practice managers, Christian Wolfenden and Michael Johnston to share their experiences of the role and how it differs from other places they...


High Court Allows Judicial Review Claim on Universal Credit Overpayment Recovery

R. (on the application of K) v Secretary of State For Work and Pensions [2023] EWHC 233 (Admin) Anyone with any experience trying to negotiate...

Sign up to our mailing list

Our mailing list is dedicated to professionals with an interest in our work.

Sign up