Rutherford Bedroom Tax appeal allowed

27 Jan 2016

In R (On the Application Of Rutherford and Ors) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2016] EWCA Civ 29, the Court of Appeal has held that Regulation B13 of the Housing Benefit Regulations 2006 – the ‘bedroom tax’ – discriminates unlawfully against (i) the families of disabled children who need a room in their house for overnight carers, and (ii) domestic violence sufferers who are part of a ‘sanctuary’ scheme. The Rutherfords are represented by Richard Drabble QC and Garden Court North Chambers’ Tom Royston, instructed by Child Poverty Action Group.

In both cases before the Court, there was in the Court of Appeal’s view an inadequate basis for distinguishing the ratio of Burnip v Birmingham City Council & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 629, [2013] PTSR 117 [2016] EWCA Civ 29

Additionally, regarding children who need a room in their house for overnight carers, it was ‘very difficult to justify’ treating children worse than adults (adults can get an extra room for an overnight carer), especially as the Secretary of State has argued that other aspects of the bedroom tax are designed to give children especially advantageous treatment.

The Court of Appeal consequently accepted that the discriminatory treatment was manifestly without reasonable foundation.

Allowing the appeals of Rutherford and  A, the Court has granted the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions permission to appeal to the Supreme Court.

A Public Sector Equality Duty argument in A, the ‘sanctuary’ case, failed, but A has been given permission to cross-appeal to the Supreme Court.

See also CPAG Press Release: Court of Appeal Rules that “Bedroom Tax” is unlawful.

Share this

Chambers news

Chambers news

The Supreme Court grants permission to appeal in Samuels v Birmingham City Council

Garden Court North Chambers' James Stark, instructed by the Community Law Partnership, has appeared for Ms Samuels throughout.

Chambers news

Supreme Court allows appeal and settles law relating to interest accruing on non-payment of confiscation orders and whether or not interest impacts on default term

Pete Weatherby QC and Matthew Stanbury succeed before the Supreme Court in R (Gene Gibson) v Secretary of State for Justice.

Chambers news

Peter Hodson – Happy Retirement

After 23 years at the Bar, most of them spent at Garden Court North Chambers, Peter Hodson has decided to retire from practice.

Chambers news

No case to answer in a prosecution alleging the murder of a baby by his parents and leave to appeal refused to the prosecution by the Court of Appeal

Garden Court North Chambers' Pete Weatherby QC and Nina Grahame represented C, the father of the baby.

Sign up to our mailing list

Our mailing list is dedicated to professionals with an interest in our work.

Sign up