EU nationals with pre-settled status can rely on EU Charter of Fundamental Rights to obtain Universal Credit

20 December 2022

Tom Royston

The Upper Tribunal agreed with the First-tier Tribunal and Child Poverty Action Group that where a refusal of universal credit would mean such a person was exposed to an actual and current risk that they and their child could not live in the UK in dignified conditions, then the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (“SSWP”) should award universal credit.

An actual risk of not being able to live in the UK in dignified conditions was held to mean a risk of being without, even for a temporary period, sufficient resources to have adequate food, clothing and accommodation (including heating for that accommodation).

In this case, AT’s support worker at the refuge had attempted to secure support from the local authority for AT but minimal support was provided and she continue to reside in the refuge, supported by the charity. In its judgment, the Upper Tribunal found that the mere theoretical availability of section 17 Children Act support from AT’s local authority did not mean her application for universal credit could be refused: what mattered was whether any Children Act support had actually and currently been provided at such a level so as to mitigate the risk.

An anonymity order is in place: Pursuant to rule 14(1) of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, there is to be no disclosure or publication of any matter likely to lead members of the public to identify the Respondent, her daughter, her support worker or the body providing the refuge used by the Respondent without the permission of a judge of the Upper Tribunal. Breach of this order may constitute contempt of court and be punishable by a fine or imprisonment.

The case is SSWP v AT (Aire Centre and /MA Intervening) [2022] UKUT 330 (AAC).

More information on the case is available at:…

A copy of the judgment is available at:…

The SSWP has been granted permission to appeal to the Court of Appeal by the Upper Tribunal.

Tom de la Mare KC (Blackstone Chambers) and Tom Royston (Garden Court North) were instructed to represent AT in the Upper Tribunal.

This article is taken from the original written by Child Poverty Action

Chambers news

Chambers news

Join us!

Due to significant demand across our core practice areas and our programme of strategic growth, Garden Court North Chambers is recruiting across all core practice...

Chambers news

Charlie Millers: Inquest finds multi-agency failings leading up to his death

Charlie Millers, a 17-year-old transgender boy, died following a ligature incident whilst a mental health patient on the Junction 17 ward, Prestwich Hospital in December...

Chambers news

R (on the application of AM (Belarus)) (Respondent) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant) [2024] UKSC 13 On appeal from: [2022] EWCA Civ 780

R (on the application of AM (Belarus)) (Respondent) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant) [2024] UKSC 13 On appeal from: [2022] EWCA...

Chambers news

Alexa Thompson’s work featured in Nearly Legal blog

Second-six pupil Alexa Thompson has had her note on Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v JA (2024) UKUT 52 (AAC) (UTJ Church) published in...

Sign up to our mailing list

Our mailing list is dedicated to professionals with an interest in our work.

Sign up