Successful out of time appeal against unlawful extended sentence

26 October 2015

Garden Court North Chambers’ Nina Grahame appeared in the Court of Appeal last week for the Appellant in R v Bennett (22.10.15 Court of Appeal, Criminal Division), instructed by the Registrar, in a successful appeal against sentence out of time. The Court of Appeal quashed an unlawful extended sentence and reduced custodial terms.

This is a case which illustrates the need for the particular care required when dealing with extended sentences, when considering multiple factors relevant to sentencing in sexual offence cases and where there are dangers of double counting aggravating features.

This application for leave to appeal sentences imposed for offences of Child Sexual Assault (SOA 2003 section 7) and Child Abduction was referred to the Full Court who granted leave to appeal. The Appellant, represented by different counsel at the Crown Court, had been convicted in his absence of the abduction of two 11 year old girls. He had allegedly watched them shoplift and then, posing as a security guard, promised them that he would destroy photographic evidence of their actions if they accompanied him to an isolated location. There he fondled and spoke lewdly to them before they ran away. The Appellant was sentenced to concurrent extended sentences for sexual assault and child abduction counts relating to each of the two girls. In each case the custodial period imposed was 5 years with an extended licence of 4 years.

No issue was taken with the assessment of dangerousness in this case.

The Court of Appeal accepted:

  • That an extended sentence could not be imposed for the child abduction counts, which are not “specified  offences”. Further, the overall term of the sentences unlawfully exceeded the maximum sentence for the offence (7 years).
  • That the Sentencing Council Guidelines feature “abduction” as a potential aggravating feature  in more than one calculation. In addition to the danger of double counting, the Court accepted Counsel’s submissions that the fact of an abduction cannot, of itself,  elevate the “harm” assessment into a Category 1 offence. In this case, the circumstances of the abduction were in no way similar to the degree of harm reflected in the other 3 features characteristic of Category 1. The sexual assaults did not represent Category 1 harm.
  • In all the circumstances, the custodial periods of the lawful extended sentences for the sexual assault counts were reduced to 4 years and the replacement determinate sentences for the child abduction counts similarly fixed at this lower figure.

Chambers news

Chambers news

Court of Appeal hands down judgment in Secretary of State for the Home Department v William George [2024] EWCA Civ 1192

On 14 October 2024, the Court of Appeal handed down its judgment in Secretary of State for the Home Department v William George [2024] EWCA...

Chambers news

GCN welcomes new pupils Bethany Currie and Misha Nayak-Oliver

Chambers is delighted to announce that Bethany Currie and Misha Nayak-Oliver commenced their pupillage on Tuesday 1 October 2024. Beth and Misha will be supervised...

Chambers news

Lyndsey Sambrooks-Wright joins Garden Court North Chambers

We are delighted to welcome Lyndsey Sambrooks-Wright, who has been an Associate Member of Chambers since 2019, as a full Member of Chambers. Lyndsey specialises...

Chambers news

Universal Credit claimant £50,000 better off after successful ‘capital limits’ appeal

Alexander McColl, instructed by Nick Molyneux of Farleys, has successfully appealed a decision by the Department of Work and Pensions (‘DWP’) to recover £29,000 worth...

Sign up to our mailing list

Our mailing list is dedicated to professionals with an interest in our work.

Sign up