The Supreme Court grants permission to appeal in Samuels v Birmingham City Council

04 Mar 2018

The Supreme Court, on 19th February 2018, granted permission to appeal against the decision of the Court of Appeal in Samuels v Birmingham City Council [2015] EWCA Civ 1051, [2015] HLR 47. Garden Court North Chambers’ James Stark, instructed by the Community Law Partnership (CLP), has appeared for Ms Samuels throughout.

In October 2015 the Court of Appeal dismissed Ms Samuels appeal against the decision of HHJ Worcester, dismissing her section 204 homeless appeal against the decision of Birmingham City Council that she was intentionally homeless because she could have made up the shortfall between her rent and her housing benefit from her subsistence benefits, but failed to do so.

The appeal to the Supreme Court concerns two important issues:

  • Whether a local authority can decide that an individual is intentionally homeless when to have been able to pay the rent they would have had to divert considerable sums from their subsistence benefits to do so due to a substantial shortfall in housing benefit caused by the local housing allowance cap; and
  • The sufficiency of reasons in a case concerning an assessment of the affordability of accommodation.

The reason for the delay between the Court of Appeal giving judgment and the obtaining of permission to appeal from the Supreme Court is set out in detail in CLP’s blog, but in summary the Legal Aid Agency repeatedly refused to fund an application for permission to appeal because it believed there was little prospect of such permission being granted.

Share this

Chambers news

Chambers news

The Northern Housing Conference: Housing law update, homelessness and the role of the law

Chambers' James Stark will be speaking about "absolute possession orders and how to avoid them" at NWHLPG's Conference on September 19th 2018.

Chambers news

Supreme Court declares law denying unmarried people widowed parent’s allowance incompatible with Convention rights

Tom Royston acted for CPAG in the matter of an application by Siobhan McLaughlin for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland) [2018] UKSC 48.

Chambers news

Permission granted in Parole Board independence case

A serving prisoner, represented by Matthew Stanbury, has been granted permission to challenge the independence of the Parole Board in a claim for judicial review.

Chambers news

Following judicial review, the DWP accepts it must pay up to an extra £150,000,000 to correct ESA errors in up to 70,000 cases

Tom Royston discusses R (Smith) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions JR/1249/2018.

Sign up to our mailing list

Our mailing list is dedicated to professionals with an interest in our work.

Sign up