Judicial review challenge to revocation of Debt Relief Order

2 July 2013

R (Howard) v Official Receiver [2013] EWHC 1839 concerned a claim for judicial review of a decision by the Official Receiver (OR) to revoke a Debt Relief Order (DRO). Garden Court North Chambers’ Ben McCormack acted for the Claimant, instructed by Carol Moores of Oldham CAB.

A DRO was approved in respect of the Claimant. A few months later she received a back payment of working tax credits which took her over the monthly income threshold, and the OR decided to revoke the DRO. The Claimant, who is disabled, challenged that decision by way of judicial review, contending that the OR had made the decision no regard had been paid to section 149 Equality Act 2010 (the public sector equality duty). However, the High Court has ruled that when the OR revoked the DRO she was exercising a ‘judicial function’ and thus was not required to comply with section 149 due to the terms of paragraph 3 of Schedule 18 to the EA 2010.

Chambers news

Chambers news

Southport Inquiry impact hearings begin

Garden Court North's Pete Weatherby KC and Christian Weaver represent the three adult survivors and Prestfield High School, respectively.

Chambers news

Rosalind Burgin and Misha Nayak-Oliver secure settlement for family of four to remain in home

The possession proceedings brought against a family of four concluded at a hearing on Tuesday (26 August) at Liverpool County Court.

Chambers news

Applications open for MHCLG Social Housing Resident Panel as sector prepares for Awaab’s Law

The Ministry for Housing has opened applications for social housing tenants to join the Resident Panel until 23:00 on 7 September 2025.

Chambers news

Misha Nayak-Oliver prevents family of four from losing their home

The Judge at the Manchester Civil Justice Centre decided not to make a possession order following Misha Nayak-Oliver's submissions.

Sign up to our mailing list

Our mailing list is dedicated to professionals with an interest in our work.

Sign up