Judicial review challenge to revocation of Debt Relief Order

2 July 2013

R (Howard) v Official Receiver [2013] EWHC 1839 concerned a claim for judicial review of a decision by the Official Receiver (OR) to revoke a Debt Relief Order (DRO). Garden Court North Chambers’ Ben McCormack acted for the Claimant, instructed by Carol Moores of Oldham CAB.

A DRO was approved in respect of the Claimant. A few months later she received a back payment of working tax credits which took her over the monthly income threshold, and the OR decided to revoke the DRO. The Claimant, who is disabled, challenged that decision by way of judicial review, contending that the OR had made the decision no regard had been paid to section 149 Equality Act 2010 (the public sector equality duty). However, the High Court has ruled that when the OR revoked the DRO she was exercising a ‘judicial function’ and thus was not required to comply with section 149 due to the terms of paragraph 3 of Schedule 18 to the EA 2010.

News

News

Christian Weaver represents Aalim Ahmed’s family at inquest into his high-rise tower death

Five-year-old Aalim Ahmed fell from the 15th floor of a social housing flat in Plaistow, East London, in 2024.

News

Garden Court North’s Pragnya Iovine successfully defends vulnerable family of five from eviction

Garden Court North pupil Pragnya Iovine successfully defended an eviction case brought by the landlord against the Defendant.

News

Ben McCormack acts for disabled client in cross-border placement heard by Vice President of the Court of Protection

Garden Court North's Ben McCormack acted for his client before the Vice President of the Court of Protection at the Royal Courts of Justice.

News

Supreme Court grants permission to appeal Palestine Action proscription

Garden Court North’s Mira Hammad and Rosalind Burgin are among counsel representing Palestine Action co-founder Huda Ammori.