Rethinking double jeopardy

5 January 2012

David Norris and Gary Dobson were convicted and sentenced for the racist murder of Stephen Lawrence this week. In an article for online magazine The Justice Gap, Garden Court North Chambers’ Mark George QC writes about the change in double jeopardy law which allowed this trial to go ahead.

In his article, Mark looks back to the historical origins of double jeopardy and contrasts the domestic position with that in the United States, “where it was regarded so fundamental that it was enshrined in the Fifth Amendment (‘nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb’™)”.

He explains that “the range of cases that can be re-tried as a result of the change in the law is limited…the interests of the accused are protected by the procedures that the prosecution have to initiate”.

Mark George QC is a barrister and Head of Chambers at Garden Court North Chambers.

News

News

Parole Board holds first public parole review hearing for prisoner convicted of a terrorism offence

Garden Court North's Alexa Thompson represented the prisoner at the public hearing in front of the Parole Board.

News

High Court grants judicial review for disabled Somerset resident to challenge council tax reduction scheme

Garden Court North's Tom Royston and Alexa Thompson represented the Claimant in his challenge to Somerset Council’s tax reduction scheme.

News

Garden Court North’s crime team: Government’s ill-considered proposals to limit jury trials will result in irrevocable damage for no tangible gain

Garden Court North's crime team unequivocally opposes the Government’s proposal to restrict the right to a jury trial.

News

Robert Rhodes avoids whole life term following rare retrial for murder

Garden Court North's Nina Grahame KC represented Mr Rhodes, who was sentenced to 29-and-a-half years in a rare double jeopardy case.

Sign up to our mailing list

Our mailing list is dedicated to professionals with an interest in our work.

Sign up