Out of time IPP sentence appeal succeeds

5 December 2011

In R v Pritchard (Court of Appeal Criminal Division 27th October 2011 – unreported), the Appellant was sentenced in 2005 to imprisonment for public protection (IPP) for an offence of robbery. Her appeal against sentence was lodged long out of time, the grounds having come to light after she sought advice in connection with parole proceedings.

The Appellant was sentenced before the IPP regime was amended (with effect from 14th July 2008) by the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008. Under the original provisions the court was required to impose an IPP for an offence of robbery if satisfied that the defendant was “dangerous”™, ie, that there was a significant risk that he/she would cause serious harm by the commission of further specified offences.

In the leading case of Lang [2006] 2 Cr App R (S) 3 the Court of Appeal emphasised that before a finding of “dangerousness” could be made sentencers had to be satisfied that there was a significant risk of the offender committing further specified offences and that he/she would cause serious harm as a result. “Serious harm”™ is defined as “death or serious personal injury, whether physical or psychological”.

In this case the Court of Appeal accepted the submission made on the Appellant’s behalf that the information before the court did not justify the conclusion that she posed a significant risk of causing serious harm. The Court quashed the sentence of IPP and substituted a determinate sentence which resulted in the Appellant’s immediate release from custody.

Ms Pritchard was represented by Garden Court North Chambers’ Kate Stone, instructed by Ian McArdle of James Murray Solicitors.

Share this

Chambers news

Chambers news

Mangrove and Ian MacDonald QC, Radical Barrister

Anniversary of death of Ian Macdonald QC, founder of Garden Court North, sees release of film on Mangrove 9 trial exposing racism in justice system.

Chambers news

Secretary of State for Work and Pensions operated unlawful policy for years of refusing Universal Credit claims from disabled students: R (Kauser and JL) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (CO/987/2020, 7 October 2020)

A new decision of the High Court has demonstrated that between 2013 and 2020, thousands of disabled students entitled to Universal Credit for essential living...

Chambers news

Root and Branch Review of the Parole Board following Judicial Review Claims

The government earlier this week announced a root and branch review of the parole system in England and Wales. This follows a judicial review claim...

Chambers news

Category A Oral Hearing Refusal Quashed

In R (Smith) v Secretary of State for Justice [2020] EWHC 2712 (Admin) the Administrative Court (Calver J) quashed a decision by the Director of Long-Term...

Sign up to our mailing list

Our mailing list is dedicated to professionals with an interest in our work.

Sign up