Upper Tribunal decision on bereavement benefits and telephone marriage

5 December 2014

In SB v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (BB) (Bereavement and death benefits: bereavement payments) [2014] UKUT 495 (AAC) (22 October 2014),  the Upper Tribunal has, in a case it describes as being of some general importance, decided not to follow the Court of Session in A v K [2011] CSOH 101, and ruled that a telephone marriage is not a valid marriage when one party to it is in the United Kingdom. The result in this case was that the appellant succeeded, and was entitled to bereavement benefit.

This decision may be of assistance in future immigration cases.

Garden Court North Chambers’ Tom Royston acted for the successful appellant SB, instructed by Howells LLP.

News

News

Garden Court North’s Pragnya Iovine successfully defends vulnerable family of five from eviction

Garden Court North pupil Pragnya Iovine successfully defended an eviction case brought by the landlord against the Defendant.

News

Ben McCormack acts for disabled client in cross-border placement heard by Vice President of the Court of Protection

Garden Court North's Ben McCormack acted for his client before the Vice President of the Court of Protection at the Royal Courts of Justice.

News

Supreme Court grants permission to appeal Palestine Action proscription

Garden Court North’s Mira Hammad and Rosalind Burgin are among counsel representing Palestine Action co-founder Huda Ammori.

News

Garden Court North hosts event in support of Rajiv Menon KC amid unprecedented prosecution

Rajiv Menon KC faces prosecution for alleged contempt of court during the closing speech he delivered to a jury in January 2026.