Upper Tribunal decision on bereavement benefits and telephone marriage

5 December 2014

In SB v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (BB) (Bereavement and death benefits: bereavement payments) [2014] UKUT 495 (AAC) (22 October 2014),  the Upper Tribunal has, in a case it describes as being of some general importance, decided not to follow the Court of Session in A v K [2011] CSOH 101, and ruled that a telephone marriage is not a valid marriage when one party to it is in the United Kingdom. The result in this case was that the appellant succeeded, and was entitled to bereavement benefit.

This decision may be of assistance in future immigration cases.

Garden Court North Chambers’ Tom Royston acted for the successful appellant SB, instructed by Howells LLP.

News

News

Date set for Home Secretary’s challenge to High Court ruling that proscription of Palestine Action was unlawful

Garden Court North’s Mira Hammad and Rosalind Burgin are among counsel representing Palestine Action co-founder Huda Ammori.

News

Academic Associate Member Professor Javaid Rehman begins pupillage

Garden Court North Chambers is delighted to announce that Academic Associate Member Professor Javaid Rehman has commenced pupillage.  

News

Covid-19 Inquiry’s Module 3 report: NHS was “on the brink of collapse” during the pandemic

Garden Court North’s Covid-19 public inquiries team has represented Covid-19 Bereaved Families for Justice UK throughout the Inquiry.

News

Failure to provide James Stow with a one-to-one mental health nurse “possibly contributed” to his death, inquest jury finds

Garden Court North's Camille Warren represented James Stow's sister during the inquest at South London Coroner's Court.

Sign up to our mailing list

Our mailing list is dedicated to professionals with an interest in our work.

Sign up