Upper Tribunal decision on bereavement benefits and telephone marriage

5 December 2014

In SB v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (BB) (Bereavement and death benefits: bereavement payments) [2014] UKUT 495 (AAC) (22 October 2014),  the Upper Tribunal has, in a case it describes as being of some general importance, decided not to follow the Court of Session in A v K [2011] CSOH 101, and ruled that a telephone marriage is not a valid marriage when one party to it is in the United Kingdom. The result in this case was that the appellant succeeded, and was entitled to bereavement benefit.

This decision may be of assistance in future immigration cases.

Garden Court North Chambers’ Tom Royston acted for the successful appellant SB, instructed by Howells LLP.

News

News

Covid-19 Inquiry: Module 10 public hearings begin on the pandemic’s societal impact

Led by Pete Weatherby KC, Garden Court North’s Covid Inquiry team represents the Covid-19 Bereaved Families for Justice UK.

News

High Court rules that proscription of Palestine Action was unlawful

Garden Court North's Mira Hammad and Rosalind Burgin represented Ms Ammori in her legal challenge to Palestine Action's proscription.

News

Council tax reduction scheme unlawfully discriminated against Universal Credit claimants

Garden Court North's Tom Royston represented the two Three Rivers residents in their claim against the local authority.

News

Palestine Action protesters cleared of aggravated burglary

Garden Court North's Mira Hammad successfully represented Palestine Action protester Leona Kamio during the trial.

Sign up to our mailing list

Our mailing list is dedicated to professionals with an interest in our work.

Sign up