Upper Tribunal decision on bereavement benefits and telephone marriage

5 December 2014

In SB v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (BB) (Bereavement and death benefits: bereavement payments) [2014] UKUT 495 (AAC) (22 October 2014),  the Upper Tribunal has, in a case it describes as being of some general importance, decided not to follow the Court of Session in A v K [2011] CSOH 101, and ruled that a telephone marriage is not a valid marriage when one party to it is in the United Kingdom. The result in this case was that the appellant succeeded, and was entitled to bereavement benefit.

This decision may be of assistance in future immigration cases.

Garden Court North Chambers’ Tom Royston acted for the successful appellant SB, instructed by Howells LLP.

News

News

Court of Appeal grants Palestine Action co-founder Huda Ammori a judicial review

Garden Court North's Mira Hammad and Rosalind Burgin are among counsel representing Palestine Action co-founder Huda Ammori.

News

Three years after his inquest, Awaab’s Law comes into force

Garden Court North’s Christian Weaver represented Awaab’s family during the inquest and subsequent campaign for Awaab’s Law.

News

Social security appeal rights strengthened by major appeal court decision

Garden Court North’s Tom Royston represented 'GD' pro bono during the Upper Tribunal appeal on social security rights.

News

Georgia Barter’s inquest concludes in finding of unlawful killing resulting from domestic abuse

Kate Stone represented Georgia Barter's family during the inquest into her unlawful killing resulting from domestic abuse.

Sign up to our mailing list

Our mailing list is dedicated to professionals with an interest in our work.

Sign up