Court of Appeal today: Government acted unlawfully in barring EU citizens from relying on ‘pre-settled status’ to access benefits, housing

18 December 2020

Last year the UK government made emergency regulations, blocking EU citizens who had been granted a right to remain in the UK from relying on their ‘pre-settled status’ to claim access to benefits, homelessness assistance, social housing and other welfare: see eg the Social Security (Income-related Benefits) (Updating and Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019.

There are currently at least 1,825,500 people in the UK with pre-settled status. Many people in that group will not need to apply for social welfare, and some others will be eligible because of a different right of residence. But the result of the 2019 Regulations was that huge numbers of EU nationals, particularly those who lost jobs due to COVID, have been excluded from access to emergency support, even though they have an absolute legal right to reside here.

In Fratila, the Court of Appeal decides today that the government acted unlawfully. It quashes relevant parts of the 2019 regulations. Its reasoning is that once the UK gives EU citizens the legal right to reside in the UK, it is discriminatory on nationality grounds to exclude them from the rights enjoyed by other people legally resident here.

The Court of Appeal has refused the government permission to appeal to the Supreme Court. It is not yet known whether the government intends to renew its application directly to the Supreme Court. The effect of today’s decision has been temporarily stayed while that is considered.

Meanwhile, anyone refused benefits, housing support or similar assistance on the ground that their only right of residence in the UK was pre-settled status should seek legal advice immediately (eg from a citizens advice bureau) on whether they should now challenge the decision. And anyone who has not claimed because they thought their pre-settled status would not make them eligible should seek advice on whether they should now make a claim.

Tom Royston acted for the appellants along with Tom de la Mare QC and Gayatri Sarathy, instructed by the Child Poverty Action Group.

There is further information about the case on CPAG’s website.

Chambers news

Chambers news

NT v Cyprus: European Court of Human Rights rules that Cyprus Government’s flawed rape prosecution violates Articles 3, 8, 14

Garden Court North's Leto Cariolou represented the Applicant in the Cypriot Government's mishandled rape allegation.

Chambers news

Covid-19 Inquiry: Module 6 hears about “forced” discharging of hospital patients without testing and “generational slaughter” in care homes

Module 6 heard how a lack of preparedness and parity between Health and Social Care led to a fatal lack of protection for the care...

Chambers news

High Court hears legal challenge against Trafford Council’s tax reduction scheme

Two Trafford residents' High Court legal challenge says the Council's tax reduction scheme unlawfully deprives low-income households.

Chambers news

40 years on, Government launches Orgreave Inquiry into violent policing at miners’ strikes

Mark George KC was a vocal campaigner calling for an Orgreave Inquiry into the South Yorkshire police's wrongdoings.

Sign up to our mailing list

Our mailing list is dedicated to professionals with an interest in our work.

Sign up