Supreme Court appeal into proscription of Palestine Action begins

4 November 2026

Garden Court North’s Mira Hammad is among counsel representing Palestine Action co-founder Huda Ammori in the two-day hearing at the Royal Court of Justice. Credit: Pete Speller / Shutterstock.

Garden Court North’s Mira Hammad is among counsel representing Palestine Action co-founder Huda Ammori in the two-day hearing at the Royal Court of Justice. Credit: Pete Speller / Shutterstock.

 

The Supreme Court will today (4 November 2026) begin hearing an appeal into the lawfulness of the Home Secretary’s decision to proscribe Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation in July 2025.

In written submissions, counsel representing Palestine Action founder Huda Ammori argue that the proscription pursuant to Section 3 of the Terrorism Act 2000 is not compatible with Articles 10 and 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

The appeal marks the first time that the Supreme Court will consider the exercise of the Home Secretary’s power to proscribe in the context of convention rights.

Following a legal challenge brought by Palestine Action founder Ms Ammori, the High Court ruled in February 2026 that the proscription was an “unlawful” interference with Articles 10 and 11 of the ECHR.

The Home Secretary appealed to the Court of Appeal, which overturned the High Court’s decision in June 2026. The Supreme Court then granted Ms Ammori permission to appeal against the Court of Appeal’s decision in August.

The case is hugely significant in addressing widespread concerns about the right to free speech and protest which the proscription suppresses, according to the United Nations’ Special Rapporteur on Counter-Terrorism, an intervener on the case. In his words, the proscription was “out of step with comparable liberal democracies, including in Europe and various common law States.”

 

Garden Court North’s Mira Hammad was instructed by Birnberg Peirce Solicitors and Kellys Solicitors to represent Ms Ammori. She is led by Raza Husain KC of Matrix Chambers and Henry Blaxland KC of Garden Court Chambers. Other junior counsel for Ms Ammori are Owen Greenhall and Audrey Mogan of Garden Court Chambers, Zoë Brereton and Tim-James Matthews of Matrix Chambers, and Paul Lukhurst and Grant Kynaston of Blackstone Chambers.

 

Additional media

Supreme Court – R (on the application of Ammori) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent)

 

For further information, please contact Alex Blair, Communications Manager at Garden Court North Chambers: ablair@gcnchambers.co.uk

News

News

Supreme Court appeal into proscription of Palestine Action begins

Garden Court North’s Mira Hammad is among counsel representing Palestine Action co-founder Huda Ammori in the two-day hearing.

News

Coroner finds failures in mental health care of Daniel Robson during admission at Priory Lakeside View Hospital

Garden Court North’s Ciara Bartlam represented Daniel Robson's family during the inquest at the Black Country Coroner’s Court.

News

Jury finds misadventure after inquest into death of David Brown

Garden Court North’s Kate Stone represented David’s family during the inquest at Liverpool Coroner’s Court.

News

Professor Javaid Rehman launches co-authored International Labour Law report at Houses of Parliament

Garden Court North Professor Javaid Rehman has co-authored a landmark report launched at the Houses of Parliament.